tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post1042954358955503505..comments2020-04-11T03:30:02.282-05:00Gary R. Welshhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15185079937305083438noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-54396472728738101442014-08-18T08:43:18.200-05:002014-08-18T08:43:18.200-05:00&quot;Police finally have an excuse for using all of that surplus military equipment left over from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.&quot;<br /><br />Is police act as a military unit and use military equipment, can we finally call it an army?<br /><br />If we&#39;re calling it an army, can we realize that we need to disband it immediately, because America is never to be occupied by martial forces?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-90404550826196334022014-08-18T07:41:53.522-05:002014-08-18T07:41:53.522-05:00If the ongoing crisis in Ferguson, MO has taught me anything it is the concept of the “agent provocateur” being used domestically. I keep hearing these unsettling rumors that homeland security has infiltrated the black rioters and is inciting violence from within. I understand spying. But this talk of intentionally inciting a response from a martial law hungry homeland security is new to me. Is this all just froth and speculation, or do we here in Indianapolis have to fear homeland security in these situations. I really feel like the sands are shifting under our feet. I’ve always pooh poohed false flag allegations as hyperbolic conspiracy theory, but there is a lot of agent provocateur talk coming our of Ferguson, and even a fogey like me has pricked up my ears. I want very much to be a traditional knee jerk supporter of the police and authorities. But I am becoming suspicious that there are forces within that act more like spies than old fashioned police or soldiers.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com