tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post113408196035263819..comments2020-04-11T03:30:02.282-05:00Gary R. Welshhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15185079937305083438noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-1134199743594295282005-12-10T02:29:00.000-05:002005-12-10T02:29:00.000-05:00Doug,<BR/><BR/>Thanks for your insightful analysis. I know the pharamacies aren't happy with it. It would set a terrible precedent to enact this type of legislation. <BR/><BR/>Drozda is a big time hypocrite. He's not at all sincere about his supposed religious views. Recall, that this is the same guy that was caught taking money from gambling interests for a phoney consulting contract. As a former lobbyist myself, he's the type of legislator that just made my blood boil. Then again, this guy started as a lobbist.Gary R. Welshhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15185079937305083438noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-1134143113880874052005-12-09T10:45:00.000-05:002005-12-09T10:45:00.000-05:00Sen. Drozda has introduced <A HREF="http://www.in.gov/legislative/bills/2006/IN/IN0004.1.html" REL="nofollow">SB 4</A> which doesn't seem to be limited to pharmacists dispensing contraception. To me the wording is broad enough to include checkout clerks at Walmart who don't want to ring up condoms. <BR/><BR/>"No person shall be required, as a condition of training, employment, pay, promotion, or privileges, to . . . dispense a birth control device or medication."<BR/><BR/>My post on Sen. Drozda's fixation on the reproductive process <A HREF="http://www.masson.us/blog/archives/2005/12/sb_4_dispensing.html" REL="nofollow">here.</A>Doughttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16655747495179504729noreply@blogger.com