tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post113937651336997073..comments2020-04-11T03:30:02.282-05:00Gary R. Welshhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15185079937305083438noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-1139446544691580142006-02-08T19:55:00.000-05:002006-02-08T19:55:00.000-05:00Why is it that, regardless of the issue, if "your guy" does it, it's bad, if "my guy" does it, non story? Does ANYBODY care about the truth anymore, or do the ends always justify the means? Maybe he IS paying, but wasn't this supposed to be about even being above the APPEARANCE of anything corrupt? Isn't that all we heard about after Clinton? I just wish people could be honest with themselves and think about what their reaction would be if it were the same situation with "my guy".Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-1139408128172817942006-02-08T09:15:00.000-05:002006-02-08T09:15:00.000-05:00What reason do you have to believe he isn't? The hatchet-piece - er, excuse me, "article" - itself says he pays fair-market value for the place. This is a NON-story that belongs in tabloids, not the Washington Post.Buckeye Beaufordhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16551351152523799335noreply@blogger.com