tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post114291652314088688..comments2020-04-11T03:30:02.282-05:00Gary R. Welshhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15185079937305083438noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-1142974559688061562006-03-21T15:55:00.000-05:002006-03-21T15:55:00.000-05:00The Star sometimes uses an abbreviated version of a longer story as they obviously did here. In this case, I think it totally lost its effectiveness as far as Pence is concerned because of what they left out as you obviously agree. It may or may not have been deliberate. I can't say for sure.Gary R. Welshhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15185079937305083438noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-1142973789305151882006-03-21T15:43:00.000-05:002006-03-21T15:43:00.000-05:00a version of this article appeared on the <A HREF="http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060319/NEWS06/603190432/1012" REL="nofollow">indy star site</A> but curiously, all the worst details about pence appear to have been edited out of the star's version. do you think it's a coincidence that the details most relevant to indiana are missing from the star's version of this article?stAllio!https://www.blogger.com/profile/00526303235883920702noreply@blogger.com