tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post115781243166336123..comments2020-04-11T03:30:02.282-05:00Gary R. Welshhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15185079937305083438noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-1158009196291745632006-09-11T16:13:00.000-05:002006-09-11T16:13:00.000-05:00or as I should have said, "ponder"Gary R. Welshhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15185079937305083438noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-1158008343684882852006-09-11T15:59:00.000-05:002006-09-11T15:59:00.000-05:00That's an interesting idea Doug. I haven't given it much thought. Someone might want to pander this course of action against the organization.Gary R. Welshhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15185079937305083438noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-1157891039319380652006-09-10T07:23:00.000-05:002006-09-10T07:23:00.000-05:00The qui tam argument is a good one.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-1157855976709236302006-09-09T21:39:00.000-05:002006-09-09T21:39:00.000-05:00I too may speak to my favorite Congresslady who is not unacquainted with Eric Miller and his minions (and mignons). I assume AI would be glad to cooperate in preparing material to send to the appropriate IRS offices ?Wilson46201https://www.blogger.com/profile/06987859307032067229noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-1157854822863481292006-09-09T21:20:00.000-05:002006-09-09T21:20:00.000-05:00Any idea if this would be an appropriate subject for a <A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qui_tam" REL="nofollow">qui tam</A> action against Advance America under the <A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_Claims_Act" REL="nofollow">False Claims Act</A>?Doughttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16655747495179504729noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-1157828681635316152006-09-09T14:04:00.000-05:002006-09-09T14:04:00.000-05:00I get AA's materials, just so I can keep informed. It's frightening stuff.<BR/><BR/>I may make a complaint to my favorite Congressperson and ask her to check with IRS on this.<BR/><BR/>As for the content, it's blatantly political. <BR/><BR/>But, be honest--are there three goofier looking legislators around?<BR/>Elvis just screams "hick!"<BR/><BR/><BR/>Harrison Ullman was right.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-1157827596334292232006-09-09T13:46:00.000-05:002006-09-09T13:46:00.000-05:00after 2 years, the I.R.S. just dropped the proceedings against the NAACP last week ...Wilson46201https://www.blogger.com/profile/06987859307032067229noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-1157820209897780762006-09-09T11:43:00.000-05:002006-09-09T11:43:00.000-05:00Apparently they are looking at the NAACP, but that's because they were anti-Bush. The IRS has investigated a few hundred of these groups in the past few years, and the IRS has concluded in an overwhelmingly number of the cases that these so-called nonprofits are violating the law.Gary R. Welshhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15185079937305083438noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-1157815969698899032006-09-09T10:32:00.000-05:002006-09-09T10:32:00.000-05:00Why does the IRS refuse to do their jobs and go after these groups. Does the religious right have total control over the IRS?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com