tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post116053282762365854..comments2020-04-11T03:30:02.282-05:00Gary R. Welshhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15185079937305083438noreply@blogger.comBlogger12125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-1160654686134936752006-10-12T07:04:00.000-05:002006-10-12T07:04:00.000-05:00You have to consider the source anon 7:09. Hailstone calls Jen Wagner of "Taking Down Words" a "dumb bitch" on his blog: http://digitalfarmers.blogspot.com/2006/10/sign-of-time.html<BR/><BR/>The mean-spiritedness of the far right is limitless.Jeff Newmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16442791690252112600noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-1160608151774765342006-10-11T18:09:00.000-05:002006-10-11T18:09:00.000-05:00Got some grassny knoll stuff for us, too, Hail?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-1160586800086765542006-10-11T12:13:00.000-05:002006-10-11T12:13:00.000-05:00Uh-huh. So what was that article a few weeks ago on the cover of the Sunday H-T that had the revolver and going on about how it's too easy for people to exercise their constitutional rights and perhaps it should be changed?<BR/><BR/>Sounds to me like a liberal call designed to get the 2nd Amendment repealed.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-1160580409036549312006-10-11T10:26:00.000-05:002006-10-11T10:26:00.000-05:00Hailstone I used to work at the B-ton newspaper...it's not a liberal bastion. And when did they advocate gutting the US Constitution? Really, you've got to stop getting your news from Sean Hannity and CCN.<BR/><BR/>But, the reporter who was "fed" this line bit. The paper needs to show why he "bit" and apologize.<BR/><BR/>And he probably needs to look for another job. It's relaly Reporting 101...and he failed.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-1160570405169951172006-10-11T07:40:00.000-05:002006-10-11T07:40:00.000-05:00Lies makes the headlines. Retractions are in fine print on page 9.<BR/><BR/>Overt bias. Considering this is the same Herald Times that suggested we gut the US Constitution it does not suprise me.<BR/><BR/>An extereme liberal newspaper is a liberal groupthink town.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-1160567807499338672006-10-11T06:56:00.000-05:002006-10-11T06:56:00.000-05:00Hmmmm lesser of two evils is Baron.<BR/><BR/>But what about that Bloomington reporter?<BR/><BR/>He needs to explain himself or hit the bricks.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-1160566897095506672006-10-11T06:41:00.000-05:002006-10-11T06:41:00.000-05:00In Hill's 2002 HRC rating, he declined to support federal hate crimes legislation or the federal non-discrimination legislation. He also declined to adopt a non-discrimination policy for his own staff.Gary R. Welshhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15185079937305083438noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-1160566573573615332006-10-11T06:36:00.000-05:002006-10-11T06:36:00.000-05:00John Hostettler voted against the federal marriage amendment as well. You think Ellsworth will hit him on that vote?Gary R. Welshhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15185079937305083438noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-1160566453414552962006-10-11T06:34:00.000-05:002006-10-11T06:34:00.000-05:00Neither Hill nor Sodrel have any record of support for gays on key issues. Hill has an even longer record, having served in the Indiana House for a number of years, in addition to 6 years in Congress. Hill supports some issues around the edges just enough so he can get some support from the Stonewall Democrats. He does not support a federal, non-discrimination law.Gary R. Welshhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15185079937305083438noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-1160566045313599032006-10-11T06:27:00.000-05:002006-10-11T06:27:00.000-05:00The National Republicans are slamming Baron Hill for voting against those gay marriage constitutional amendments. Sodrel voted for them.<BR/><BR/>Mike Sodrel is no friend of the LGBT community and should be rejected at the polls !Wilson46201https://www.blogger.com/profile/06987859307032067229noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-1160562708906252922006-10-11T05:31:00.000-05:002006-10-11T05:31:00.000-05:00Maybe it's early, but I don't get it.<BR/><BR/><BR/>I can't stand Sodrel. But it looks like this reporter was fed a line by Hill's people or some other Sodrel hater, and he ran with it without checking facts.<BR/><BR/>If so, he should be fired.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-1160542277234707702006-10-10T23:51:00.000-05:002006-10-10T23:51:00.000-05:00AI, the media does this kind of scew up all the time. At least Sodrel apparently got a correction printed.<BR/><BR/>But, the more important issue is, as a gay man, whether you think Sodrel is the better man to serve that district or not.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com