tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post116579958570115951..comments2020-04-11T03:30:02.282-05:00Gary R. Welshhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15185079937305083438noreply@blogger.comBlogger16125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-1165854913094683852006-12-11T11:35:00.000-05:002006-12-11T11:35:00.000-05:0011:25 - <A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guy_Hunt" REL="nofollow">Wikipedia is your friend</A>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-1165854349526947422006-12-11T11:25:00.000-05:002006-12-11T11:25:00.000-05:00Guy Hunt? Ok, I'm officially lost.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-1165848166277303472006-12-11T09:42:00.000-05:002006-12-11T09:42:00.000-05:00<I>Sounds like he funded his household for awhile off this campaign. Damn.</I><BR/><BR/>Damn is right. Just ask Guy Hunt[1]<BR/><BR/><BR/><BR/><BR/>[1]Southern state governor that was impeached because he used campaign funds to remodel his house. Big oops.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-1165847765597654222006-12-11T09:36:00.000-05:002006-12-11T09:36:00.000-05:00He filed the reports, anon 9:25. The problem was the content of the reports, or lack thereof.Gary R. Welshhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15185079937305083438noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-1165847124489494772006-12-11T09:25:00.000-05:002006-12-11T09:25:00.000-05:00A friend who ran for office filed his reports on time, and kept copies (thankfully). The Election board sent him threatening post-election campaign finance report letters. They lost the report twice.<BR/><BR/>It became comical.<BR/><BR/>Point is: I wouldn't automatically assume the Councillor did not file the reports as required. But if he did, he should have copies.<BR/><BR/>You can buy food for campaign workers, but that is a sticky wicket. Sounds like he funded his household for awhile off this campaign. Damn.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-1165841606594490772006-12-11T07:53:00.000-05:002006-12-11T07:53:00.000-05:00Brad did share with me that the Rs viewed his district as being overwhelmingly Democratic and if it had been a competitive district, they would have taken the issue more seriously.Gary R. Welshhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15185079937305083438noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-1165835218460058262006-12-11T06:06:00.000-05:002006-12-11T06:06:00.000-05:00LMAO Wilson you took the bait on the spelling<BR/><BR/>What a joke<BR/><BR/>And, 10:49, Mr. Vane was never a member of the Voter Registration Board or the County Election Board. He was the Election board's hired gun. Pleasant, but strictly an order-follower.<BR/><BR/>The clerk's office has been the excllusive domain of Republican election law philandering and manipulation, for over 30 years.<BR/><BR/>Ding, dong, that witch is dead. Finally.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-1165813221641477402006-12-11T00:00:00.000-05:002006-12-11T00:00:00.000-05:00Good for you Wilson46201. I've watched you throughout the last campaign cycle. You are doing a great job.<BR/><BR/>Talk about 'avoiding' issues, 9:39, this blog is full of people who have done nothing BUT avoid the issues.<BR/><BR/>As a hate-fest and cesspool for anyone who is anti-Democrat to wallow in, this blog really needs some help.<BR/><BR/>So, keep up the good work Wilson.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-1165808977674170402006-12-10T22:49:00.000-05:002006-12-10T22:49:00.000-05:00AI- Any insight into the Vane role in dissuading investigation? That struck me as strange, he's the R on the board (or one of the R's).Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-1165807279084567132006-12-10T22:21:00.000-05:002006-12-10T22:21:00.000-05:00<I>Anonymous said...<BR/><BR/> Oh Lord now Wilson is giving grammar lessons.<BR/><BR/> Yet one more sign the apocolypse is upon us.<BR/> 9:30 PM EST</I><BR/><BR/>It's spelled "apocalypse" in English - but thanks for playing!Wilson46201https://www.blogger.com/profile/06987859307032067229noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-1165804784489367262006-12-10T21:39:00.000-05:002006-12-10T21:39:00.000-05:00Wilson is the mold for all that is wrong with our community. Avoid the actual issues by correcting improper word use and/or grammar. Do us all a favor Wilson and throw your keyboard out into traffic!!!!!!!! Ya moronAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-1165804255593283072006-12-10T21:30:00.000-05:002006-12-10T21:30:00.000-05:00Oh Lord now Wilson is giving grammar lessons.<BR/><BR/>Yet one more sign the apocolypse is upon us.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-1165803041013420702006-12-10T21:10:00.000-05:002006-12-10T21:10:00.000-05:00AI is rarely sloppy about writing - that's why the error is confusing.Wilson46201https://www.blogger.com/profile/06987859307032067229noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-1165801986479446712006-12-10T20:53:00.000-05:002006-12-10T20:53:00.000-05:00And you have nothing better to comment on than his spelling and grammar?<BR/><BR/>I think he meant "disillusioning"Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-1165801612620826712006-12-10T20:46:00.000-05:002006-12-10T20:46:00.000-05:00<B>dissolutioning</B> -- Huh?<BR/><BR/>Dissolution is the term for the legal process by which an adoption is reversed. While this applies to the vast majority of adoptions which are terminated, they are more commonly referred to as disruptions, even though that term technically applies only to those that are not legally complete at the time of termination.<BR/><BR/>In relation to a company, dissolution refers to the process by which the legal existence of the company is brought to an end.Wilson46201https://www.blogger.com/profile/06987859307032067229noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-1165800020729822502006-12-10T20:20:00.000-05:002006-12-10T20:20:00.000-05:00Hmmmmmmm .... HMMMMMMMMM ... so maybe THIS is what the 'Rats were holding over Mr. Abdullah.<BR/><BR/>Nice one Gary!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com