tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post1211765973301263192..comments2020-04-11T03:30:02.282-05:00Gary R. Welshhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15185079937305083438noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-14166919155126105422007-10-21T08:15:00.000-05:002007-10-21T08:15:00.000-05:00"Indiana deserves better from both its D and R representatives on the Hill."<BR/><BR/>Especially that one D that has others voting for her.Sir Hailstonehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16301073859882785758noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-12822088872528580772007-10-20T22:37:00.000-05:002007-10-20T22:37:00.000-05:00"I won't make smarmy comments about your presidential/veep choices, if you do likewise.<BR/><BR/>Cause I'd have a hell of a lot more fun, and hit a lot more paydirt.<BR/><BR/>LOTS more."<BR/><BR/>If you want smarmy without substance, I suggest you peruse TDW. Meanwhile, no one is impressed with infantile hyperbole.<BR/><BR/>Frankly, I hope Bayh goes this route. It'll be the end of a political career thats been nothing but style over substance. Indiana deserves better from both its D and R representatives on the Hill.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-42216529188422866582007-10-20T22:35:00.000-05:002007-10-20T22:35:00.000-05:005:43, Hillary doesn't need your vote. I do agrre that we've had enough of the Bushes. 1/20/09 can't come fast enough.<BR/>As for Bayh, he would make it the closest presidential contest in Indiana in decades, a likely help Hillary win Ohio, too. I'm not sure what "red states" Gary refers too, but there's plenty of purple ones to choose fron, i.e. Virginia, Arkansas, Kentucky ...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-7109482566730645222007-10-20T21:56:00.000-05:002007-10-20T21:56:00.000-05:00I Just dont see Indiana supporting Clinton. This could be the end of Bayh;s career in politicsAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-38875884687860911842007-10-20T17:43:00.000-05:002007-10-20T17:43:00.000-05:00You may ask Gary to not mention the candidates but that won't stop me from saying I would never vote for the shrill whiney voiced socialist Clinton. We have have enough of the Clintons and the Bush's and Peterson and the council cronies too. Time for fresh new ideas and faces.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-55254009842591928492007-10-20T13:08:00.000-05:002007-10-20T13:08:00.000-05:00Gary, love your blog, but here's a deal:<BR/><BR/>I won't make smarmy comments about your presidential/veep choices, if you do likewise.<BR/><BR/>Cause I'd have a hell of a lot more fun, and hit a lot more paydirt.<BR/><BR/>LOTS more.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-35343953966792745602007-10-20T11:57:00.000-05:002007-10-20T11:57:00.000-05:00Indiana will not support Clinton. A Clinton-Bayh team will go down in flames. Bayh is not presidential and never will be. Clinton didn't make a good First Lady...President? What a joke.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-19034678317835781132007-10-20T11:23:00.000-05:002007-10-20T11:23:00.000-05:00Oh my God!<BR/><BR/>PARIS -- Hillary Rodham Clinton, the leading Democratic candidate for U.S. President, may be called as a material witness in the State of California, in what may be the largest election fraud in U.S. history. All news of this case has been effectively censored in the U.S. mainstream media. Read the full story in The Wall Street Journal, <A HREF="http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB118973400928827314-rv8T2EM0ONBOhA2IkZOvIVHM_Vc_20071013.html?mod=tff_main_tff_top" REL="nofollow">"For Clinton, 2000 Fund-Raising Controversy Lingers"</A>.<BR/><BR/>Hillary may have violated the law by not reporting large contributions to her successful 2000 campaign for U.S. Senator. Mr. Peter F. Paul claims that his contributions were omitted from the public reports filed with the Federal Election Commission, and Hillary denies all knowledge of these contributions. Read the latest ruling in <A HREF="http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/opinions/nonpub/B191066.PDF" REL="nofollow">Case B191066</A>, Paul v. Clinton.<BR/><BR/>Hillary even denies knowing Mr. Paul, a three time convicted felon, who made the contributions to her 2000 Senate campaign. A video, <A HREF="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7007109937779036019" REL="nofollow">"Hillary Exposed"</A>, produced by the Equal Justice Foundation of America has been viewed more than 784,000 times. A case such as this normally ends any aspirations that a politician may have for public office, and certainly raises questions about the illicit fund-raising practices in the Clinton camp.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com