tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post1323219597748263992..comments2020-04-11T03:30:02.282-05:00Gary R. Welshhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15185079937305083438noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-35327129514820020152008-11-02T19:38:00.000-05:002008-11-02T19:38:00.000-05:00That whole "suppression of the vote" argument is pure demagoguery. Democrats launch it at every opportunity Republicans make to insist that the election be fair. <BR/><BR/>I'm sure "Artfuggins" knows what real suppression of the vote is since it was exclusively the Democrat Party that for years suppressed black vote in the SouthPaul K. Ogdenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16137003328850866711noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-39104779514136180012008-11-02T07:58:00.000-05:002008-11-02T07:58:00.000-05:00Those are the Ed Treacy/Andy Jaoobs talking points--two people who have engaged in more obfuscation and misrepresentation in local politics than just about any other politico. Having the county elections board rather than the local precinct boards making calls on the validity of provisional ballots does not equate to suppressing votes. Try again.Gary R. Welshhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15185079937305083438noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-75653580809955554172008-11-01T23:33:00.000-05:002008-11-01T23:33:00.000-05:00The only confusion is the lawasuit filed by an appointee of Mitch Daniels in an attempt to suppress the vote.artfugginshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05364503656694166926noreply@blogger.com