tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post1343175703027271241..comments2020-04-11T03:30:02.282-05:00Gary R. Welshhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15185079937305083438noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-83755782731122779292014-06-25T11:33:55.702-05:002014-06-25T11:33:55.702-05:00I say it "strikes a blow for" Fourth Amendment advocates--that means to help. I didn't say it "strikes a blow against" Fourth Amendment advocates. Gary R. Welshhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15185079937305083438noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-85965931407306838142014-06-25T10:56:59.550-05:002014-06-25T10:56:59.550-05:00Gary, I apologize but it has been a long time since H.S. civics class (and the idea of cell phones was only a reality on Star Trek in those days). Wouldn't 4th admendment advocates like that police can't use phone data without a warrant? Or were these advocates wanting to restrict police from accessing phone data even in situations when police are pursing a fleeing suspect or trying to assist a seriosly injued person, etc. And how could phone data be used as a weapon to harm an arresting officer? Seems like the data would be used to prosecute the phone's owner. Thanks!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com