tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post1901054137612410595..comments2020-04-11T03:30:02.282-05:00Gary R. Welshhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15185079937305083438noreply@blogger.comBlogger11125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-75319005537530007472008-03-16T15:14:00.000-05:002008-03-16T15:14:00.000-05:0011:58, The man lied about a damn blowjob for cryin' out loud!<BR/>It wasn't like he outed a CIA agent and threatened national security.<BR/>The whole impeachement was nothing more than a Republican gig.<BR/>He lied about a blowjob, who the hell cares????????<BR/>Weinberger and Powell lied for Reagan during Iran-Contra and that was OK?<BR/>Guns and drugs OK but lie about a blowjob and you get impeached.<BR/>LMAO!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-71175729829094814372008-03-16T13:06:00.000-05:002008-03-16T13:06:00.000-05:00http://www.tomroeser.com/ This is the place to learn all about Obama. Blog goes back a few years and so is not corrupted by present day views.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-21435472112816798792008-03-16T11:58:00.000-05:002008-03-16T11:58:00.000-05:00Anonymous wrote:<BR/>"...on Clinton and in the end all the GOP ended up with was blowjob."<BR/><BR/>That's not entirely true. Apparently, the charge that he committed perjury was substantive and substantial enough that he either surrendered his law license or was disbarred.<BR/><BR/>Perjury is serious. It's even worse for an attorney.<BR/><BR/>ARAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-20279314686840825732008-03-16T09:19:00.000-05:002008-03-16T09:19:00.000-05:00Fitzgerald had more than a sufficient amount of evidence to take down the President in the Plame affair and decided to allow Libby to fall on the sword.<BR/>Then of course was the Walsh Commission on Iran-Contra when both a President and a Vice President walked when both were guilty of impeachable offenses.<BR/>Then there was the millions of dollars spent on Kenneth Starr to find something, anything, on Clinton and in the end all the GOP ended up with was blowjob.<BR/>I'm sorry, but this blog is starting to read like a script from the Fox News Network.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-19188352572907746362008-03-16T08:41:00.000-05:002008-03-16T08:41:00.000-05:00anon 7:21, we'll see what Patrick Fitzgerald turns up in his continued investigation of corrupt Illinois pols. It's hitting pretty close to home for Obama already.Gary R. Welshhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15185079937305083438noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-59394206270665937112008-03-16T08:08:00.000-05:002008-03-16T08:08:00.000-05:00Attacking those who know those who we REALLY want to attack is great fun, and it makes for interesting political theater, but I'm wondering how often it's fair. For example, can we assume Elliott Spitzer's main donors knew he was going to a prositute? I would say, probably not, or they wouldn't have given to him. Did Mark Foley's donors (or even his family) know he was a pedophile? What about Senator Craig? Did his donors (or even his Wife) know? What about Governor McGreevey's family? If the main donors for these people don't know the hidden secrets when they're all under the press scrutiny, how many candidates are going to know the dirt on all their main donors? My point is this. Obama denounced this guy, though maybe not as strongly as some wish. But I also remember a President who had NO denunciation for a guy named Scooter Libby, who is an ACTUAL CONVICTED FELON. If somebody wants to investigate Obama for corruption, they should do it, so they can find nothing, and then go about shutting up.POPAhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00558836541249077077noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-4898543447888698562008-03-16T07:21:00.000-05:002008-03-16T07:21:00.000-05:00First of all, Obamas's house is NOT a mansion. It's a tricked out American Four Square style house in a decent neighborhood on Chicago's southside. In parts of Chicago, $1.4 mil doesn't buy a lot of house. In Indy yes, Chicago no.<BR/>Secondly, Rezko's actions are no different than many involved with both the Republican and Democrat candidates in Indiana. Remember the $1 million raised in a few hours for Mitch at the REAL mansion of Mr.Voice Mail?<BR/>Look at the money bankrolled by SerVaas into the national GOP coffers that kept him from being indicted for dealing with Saddam Hussein's brass works making shell casings. Or Servaas's business interests in South Africa when the US had a trade embargo.<BR/>Rezko may very well be guilty but Obama has done nothing wrong other than accept contributions from a man that at the time, was never accused of any wrongdoing.<BR/>It's OK for Lugar to write letters endorsing suspect ethanol plants for his contributors and Obama can't do the same?<BR/>This Obama-Rezko thing, in the end, has no legs Gary other than some lame atttempt to smear Obama.<BR/>It is obvious that you, a straight ticket Republican, would much rather have Hillary Clinton on the Dem ticket that Obama. Hillary would be certain to insure GOP victories in Indiana, particularly Mitch's but Obama? Well, with Obama at the top of the ticket means it could be a worse year for Republicans than it's already going to be. <BR/>To 99% of the average voters this Rezko conspiracy is a tiny blip unworthy of even discussing for lack of any wrongdoing on Obama's part. If Obabam's indicted then you can write all you want about it. That's not going to happen.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-49548151202779801732008-03-16T00:41:00.000-05:002008-03-16T00:41:00.000-05:00Doug, It's become all too clear how Rezko conducted business in Illinois poliitics. If you were a friend of his, you were probably on the take.Gary R. Welshhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15185079937305083438noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-67124755469953772442008-03-15T21:14:00.000-05:002008-03-15T21:14:00.000-05:00Money from Keating. At least the appearance of impropriety. At least as much as the Rezko/Obama connection.Doughttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11424730556609713021noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-4316822489993084932008-03-15T21:09:00.000-05:002008-03-15T21:09:00.000-05:00What did John McCain have to do with Keating?<BR/><BR/>As I recall from the report, he had little to nothing to do with it.<BR/><BR/>ARAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-26123689186343212572008-03-15T19:42:00.000-05:002008-03-15T19:42:00.000-05:00Between Rezko and Keating, you're going to have to sit home in November.Doughttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11424730556609713021noreply@blogger.com