tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post2132281234081410915..comments2020-04-11T03:30:02.282-05:00Gary R. Welshhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15185079937305083438noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-15882189565029036282012-02-25T18:32:46.550-05:002012-02-25T18:32:46.550-05:00Yeah, I hope someone didn&#39;t pay Bohnet to argue for the challengers. He didn&#39;t act like his head or heart was in it.Gary R. Welshhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15185079937305083438noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-75869277521290806262012-02-25T18:17:52.084-05:002012-02-25T18:17:52.084-05:00I was only present for the first part of the Lugar presentation. ACommission member asked the Lugar challenger&#39;s attorney why he thnks Lugar&#39;s inhabitancy is a problem when thrree AG opinons (still not sure who that third AG is or where the opinion is) say otherwise. The attorney said he disagreed with the opinon.<br /><br />NO!!!! The 1982 Pearson and 2012Zoeller opinon never addresses whether Lugar is an inhabitant of the State of Indiana as required by Article I of the United States Constitution. In fact, the U.S. Constitution is never even mentioned in either opinion. Both opinions rely solely on state law and never offer an opinion as to whether Lugar satisfies the constitutional requirement for Lugar to serve as U.S. Senator.Paul K. Ogdenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16137003328850866711noreply@blogger.com