tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post3093699699144563475..comments2020-04-11T03:30:02.282-05:00Gary R. Welshhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15185079937305083438noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-54138886308419586692007-03-22T20:06:00.000-05:002007-03-22T20:06:00.000-05:00"Financial interdependence" might have been solved if the couple in question only had a joint bank account for most of their relationship,huh? Then it'd be a different case.<BR/><BR/>You're right. Future cases will be moot if SJR7 is enacted. And future legislatures, should they want to try to clear up the messes, will have to first repeal SJR7 as an Amendment. Future legislatures are barred from action, under SJR7.<BR/><BR/>It is so utterly complete and sweeping that I'm stunned the judges haven't spoken out agianst it. It is an outright assault on the judicial branch of government, nothing less.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com