tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post3349757666370412842..comments2020-04-11T03:30:02.282-05:00Gary R. Welshhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15185079937305083438noreply@blogger.comBlogger14125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-44904203575020044382007-03-07T10:10:00.000-05:002007-03-07T10:10:00.000-05:00Condi is not the right woman because she's a walking contradiction. She loves the aroma of power so much, she'll suck up all reason and personal belief, to stand behind this president and his ridiculous policies.<BR/><BR/>She has no moral core.<BR/><BR/>Her VP confirmation hearings would be a hoot. <BR/><BR/>"Madame Secretary, at what point did you advise the President, and Atty. Gen. Ashcroft, that the potential foreign agent detention plan might violate our Consittution? And that its implementation might endanger our field agents around the world?<BR/><BR/>"Madame Secretary? Why are you weeping?"<BR/><BR/>An opportunist, purely and simply. In my book, she's an unindicted co-conspirator in the Chaney war.<BR/><BR/>Shame on her, and a pox on her ilk.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-20026380322907510002007-03-06T20:30:00.000-05:002007-03-06T20:30:00.000-05:00Yes, they would block it, she is the wrong party. The democrats think they know what women want. Sorry, not this woman.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-32900915363718182512007-03-06T19:12:00.000-05:002007-03-06T19:12:00.000-05:00I don't know, Doug. Do you think the Dems would block the first African-American and female V.P.?Gary R. Welshhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15185079937305083438noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-14166511093292447442007-03-06T19:01:00.000-05:002007-03-06T19:01:00.000-05:00If Cheney were to resign, and if Rice were selected by Bush, I would love to see the confirmation hearings. (And, for fun, just how would such confirmation hearings work if Cheney had resigned, and one of the Dems became incapacitated, resulting in a 50-50 split.)Doughttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16655747495179504729noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-72273309852451613242007-03-06T16:35:00.000-05:002007-03-06T16:35:00.000-05:00Of course he lied about the bl*wj*b! He is married and the girl who gave it wasn't his wife.<BR/>If I were to get a bl*wj*b from another woman, I'd deny it as well. Thats the SMART thing to do!<BR/>(If I were the Pres., I'd have pick a better looking woman the Monica)garyjhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18141621101828080762noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-38764397607652793522007-03-06T16:26:00.000-05:002007-03-06T16:26:00.000-05:00Let the adults discuss politics in peace - the sheltered anonymous <I>faux naifs</I> shouldn't try to hijack a thread!Wilson46201https://www.blogger.com/profile/06987859307032067229noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-31528597464970125322007-03-06T16:10:00.000-05:002007-03-06T16:10:00.000-05:00Wilson: Then set the example by raising your level of discourse out of the gutter.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-24031480966997975922007-03-06T15:59:00.000-05:002007-03-06T15:59:00.000-05:00Once again, an anonymous nobody trying to sidetrack a political discussion off into personal insults against a commenter. Relentless, aren't they?<BR/><BR/>Just stay on topic, please!Wilson46201https://www.blogger.com/profile/06987859307032067229noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-31013473015226843152007-03-06T15:42:00.000-05:002007-03-06T15:42:00.000-05:00Nice use of the gutter term, Wilson. That says so much about you.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-65461530666290565482007-03-06T15:18:00.000-05:002007-03-06T15:18:00.000-05:00So let me get this straight -- according to conservatives, lying about a blow job was an impeachable offense, but lying about outing a CIA agent focused on the Iranian nuclear program is much ado about nothing? Okay, got it.Wilson46201https://www.blogger.com/profile/06987859307032067229noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-17645295879989343122007-03-06T14:08:00.000-05:002007-03-06T14:08:00.000-05:00Asking why Clinton didn't go to jail was a rhetorical question. Or perhaps an ironical one.<BR/>Nonetheless, he DID lie to a grand jury. Not to mention witness tampering, obstruction of justice etc etc.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-77478588772340460402007-03-06T13:52:00.000-05:002007-03-06T13:52:00.000-05:00Clinton, my dear friend altho a lout, was not charged by a federal prosecutor.<BR/><BR/>He was charged by the House. And in the Senate trial he was not convicted.<BR/><BR/>End if history lesson.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-864389887697980832007-03-06T13:23:00.000-05:002007-03-06T13:23:00.000-05:00LYing to a grand jury is a crime? Then why didn't Clinton go to jail?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-1789676121386242662007-03-06T12:40:00.000-05:002007-03-06T12:40:00.000-05:00Resign, be impeached, whatever...<BR/><BR/>Of COURSE Libby was guilty. The only question now is a potential pardon, which I wouldn't put past Bush.<BR/><BR/>Condi can't be VP. She's a freaking unindicted co-conspirator for this ridiculous war. She has been a less-harsh face on the war, for which she should be held accountable.<BR/><BR/>Lying to a grand jury and/or prosecutors was, and is, a crime. This jury convicted on four counts.<BR/><BR/>Beyond all reasonable doubt.<BR/><BR/>Why Libby didn't respond to questions with an "I don't recall" is beyond me. Instead, he willingly chose lies.<BR/><BR/>And, by the by, he's also guilty of having a stupid ninckname and not chan ging it.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com