tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post389745708654050317..comments2020-04-11T03:30:02.282-05:00Gary R. Welshhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15185079937305083438noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-41290112490928826252012-01-29T14:55:38.789-05:002012-01-29T14:55:38.789-05:00no, in 2008 the voters could "bullet vote". there was no rule that required voters to cast the maximum number of votes.JudgeNothttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13738417177257644421noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-16760234158409725072012-01-28T22:24:36.091-05:002012-01-28T22:24:36.091-05:00I wasn't present for that slating convention, Paul. There were at least three more running than were elected and it took multiple ballots. People may have been allowed to vote for fewer than the number to be elected, which is why it may have taken multiple ballots.Gary R. Welshhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15185079937305083438noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-7185806858273835522012-01-28T20:13:39.472-05:002012-01-28T20:13:39.472-05:00In 2008, did we have a rule that we had to vote for the maximum candidates possible in slating? I know we had multiple ballots in that slating.Paul K. Ogdenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16137003328850866711noreply@blogger.com