tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post4155662442799211049..comments2020-04-11T03:30:02.282-05:00Gary R. Welshhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15185079937305083438noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-21480485955520983712008-03-27T12:22:00.000-05:002008-03-27T12:22:00.000-05:00Yes, but the notes might include information on other sources who led Ryckaert to Frazier. He has already written about the interview. Why would police need to see his notes?Gary R. Welshhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15185079937305083438noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-54680213478623795902008-03-27T09:01:00.000-05:002008-03-27T09:01:00.000-05:00The media shield law clearly doesn't apply here. It only protects journalists against being forced to reveal <B>sources</B>. Ryckaert isn't being asked to reveal his source; police already know who the source is. Instead, he is being asked to turn over evidence that may or may not be relevant to the commission of a crime. There may be another reason why they aren't entitled to the information (although I'm not sure what it would be), but it's not the media shield law.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07519737020352873595noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-56262594027921701302008-03-27T00:40:00.000-05:002008-03-27T00:40:00.000-05:00I know a good present for the Marion County Prosecutor's Office...a copy of the Indiana Code. Can they not read a simple statute?Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08899023066910200507noreply@blogger.com