tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post4457509907009202437..comments2020-04-11T03:30:02.282-05:00Gary R. Welshhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15185079937305083438noreply@blogger.comBlogger23125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-85638888341086432702007-10-17T18:23:00.000-05:002007-10-17T18:23:00.000-05:00Goldsmith left the public safety pension fund in a huge deficit. Peterson has chipped away at it each year but the baby boom generation is retiring and the deficit was huge for the next few years. Too bad that Goldsmith spent the money for pensions on operating expenses so it he could brag that the didnt raise taxes.....but he did it at the expense of the retirement of police and firefighters.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-45391208446646053282007-10-17T15:17:00.000-05:002007-10-17T15:17:00.000-05:00Hi,<BR/><BR/>We cannot answer your question. We suggest that you call the mayor's office, but do not expect a return call. His office ignores citizen complaints and questions unless the media is there, in which case, he then tries every trick in the book to avoid us.M Theoryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01892309818226431745noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-46258198286404138612007-10-17T11:58:00.000-05:002007-10-17T11:58:00.000-05:00Hey, the sign is crooked, just like the city's current crop of politicians.Bart Lieshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01294734264133374462noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-8259270860001587412007-10-17T11:07:00.000-05:002007-10-17T11:07:00.000-05:00HFFT, I would simply like an explanation of why, if the safety pensions have been this long, long standing issue, why Peterson is only dealing with it in his 8th year in office. It certainly appears that he wanted to seize the opportunity to raise the COIT -- at the time thinking no one was really paying attention -- and put it behind the guise of safety.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-66331594344795242012007-10-17T10:54:00.000-05:002007-10-17T10:54:00.000-05:00HFFT-<BR/><BR/>The Mayor is fixing the CSO's as prmised (after Goldie wasted $1 Billion by not fixing them). There you go.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-395443379945039302007-10-17T10:39:00.000-05:002007-10-17T10:39:00.000-05:00ATTENTION 25th floor:<BR/>Here is a challenge from Hoosiers For Fair Taxation. <BR/><BR/>Can anyone from Mayor Peterson's staff or the democratic party tell the people of Indianapolis what promises Bart Peterson kept during the nearly 8 years he has held office and back it up with documentation? We want to give Peterson a fair shake to show the tax payers he worked in their best interest during his two terms.M Theoryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01892309818226431745noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-42275778746901093422007-10-17T08:55:00.000-05:002007-10-17T08:55:00.000-05:00Mary Beth Schneider's article was a personality profile on a man running for mayor whose background and competency is largely unknown. It was not intended to nail down his positions or action plan.<BR/>Mary Beth did not insert her own opinion into any of it ... she merely cited the opinions of others. Perhaps the article's only fault was to not present the opinions of one or two of his critics, but perhaps she couldn't find any.<BR/>Overall, it was illuminating and insightful as to Ballard's background, nothing more, nothing less.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-89585209108031189462007-10-17T06:55:00.000-05:002007-10-17T06:55:00.000-05:00anon 3:26, yes it contained opinions--opinions of people who know him. That's the nature of a biographical sketch. Schneider put a lot of work into the feature story, tracing his roots and interviewing people who knew him along the way. If the story had included a superior who criticized his work and said he wasn't up to the job, you would be heaping praise on Schneider. You can't stand the fact she learned what a solid, accomplished man he's been. You are into slash and burn politics like so many of your Democratic counterparts. Don't blame Schneider for discovering who Greg Ballard is.Gary R. Welshhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15185079937305083438noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-17462194922898442522007-10-17T03:26:00.000-05:002007-10-17T03:26:00.000-05:00No, Gary, it was a puff piece because: <BR/><BR/>It contained opinions, not just Q/A<BR/><BR/>It contained no new news<BR/><BR/>It had a sensational headline on a news page, above the fold, was not labled "news analysis" or "opinion," and brought nothing new to the scene.<BR/><BR/>It was, and is, a puff piece. Ballard's a nice guy, bright, and could get elected. I doubt it, but he could.<BR/><BR/>Schneider has resorted to this kind of writing before. It's intellectually lazy, ala Tully, and avoided the tough questions whose answers we needed to hear.<BR/><BR/>Like:<BR/><BR/>Where, Mr. Ballard, would you get the authority to undo the police merger, as you have said you'd do?<BR/><BR/>And about forty attendant and subsequent questions.<BR/><BR/><BR/>And: exactly which positions/programsd would you cut to reduce the budget?<BR/><BR/>Not a huge mental leap to ask them...perhaps a huge mental leap to answer them...so far we don't know. And thanks to the lazy media in this town, we may never know.<BR/><BR/>This article's writing was far from heavy lifting.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-44216621317174198042007-10-16T22:43:00.000-05:002007-10-16T22:43:00.000-05:00The Anonymous Coward at 8:31PM Wrote:<BR/><BR/>"Ms. Schneider's article should've been labled news analysis...it was not news. It was a puff piece, pure and simple."<BR/><BR/>And Matt Tully's columns defending the moonbat status quo (Carson, Gray, Peterson, etc.) are NOT puff pieces?<BR/><BR/>I'm still shocked MBS's column made it past Ryerson's desk. I thought the only decent person still working at the Rag was Gary Varvel.Sir Hailstonehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16301073859882785758noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-91175221322255957122007-10-16T21:40:00.000-05:002007-10-16T21:40:00.000-05:00I agree Gary.<BR/><BR/>Get off this blog Wilson!<BR/>flipperAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-70448238889570509992007-10-16T21:33:00.000-05:002007-10-16T21:33:00.000-05:00Not a World Class City by any means....in fact, we're now being called South Detroit!!!<BR/><BR/>An expert has stated that we are WORSE than Detroit was during the height of its corruption, that caused all the working people to flee the county for Macomb & Oakland County in Michigan!<BR/><BR/>http://whoisakindele.info/2007/10/indianapolis-101-conservatives-must.htmlAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-15212958215183904022007-10-16T21:32:00.000-05:002007-10-16T21:32:00.000-05:00Grover, well said. Thank you.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-43499787679501839802007-10-16T21:25:00.000-05:002007-10-16T21:25:00.000-05:00This Democrat attended the Indiana Equality meeting tonight at United Methodist Church up on 38th st, and after listening to my Democrat At-large councilors rationalize and justify their tax increases and defense of ethically challenged members of the caucus, and upon hearing the challengers refute the information they presented, well- I'm voting for Macguire, Malone, and Hegg. These 3 are definitely more in touch with the communities concerns and remedies for the past few years of my councilors behavior and legislation, sad to say.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-84796511723683887742007-10-16T20:59:00.000-05:002007-10-16T20:59:00.000-05:00"I think that this sign is in poor taste........but then what would you expect from Ballard."<BR/><BR/>Your ignorance speaks volume. If you paid any attention to local politics you would know that Ballard has nothing to do with either sign.<BR/> Mayor Peterson is responsible for the big blue lie.<BR/>Hoosiers for Honesty in Government PAC are responsible for the little white sign that projects the truth.<BR/><BR/>Poor taste is misinforming the public...Poor taste is raising spending without increasing service...poor taste is condoning ghost employment...poor taste is reducing public safety...poor taste is supporting a Mayor who has turned this town into a little Oakland or Detroit and then stood up told us how lucky we are to live here.<BR/><BR/>Poor taste? The definition of poor taste is Bart Peterson.<BR/><BR/><BR/>Great post Gary.indyerniehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03817373902728915873noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-13782651553518818762007-10-16T20:50:00.000-05:002007-10-16T20:50:00.000-05:00If the Democrat blogs are posting anti-Ballard statements I would say that's a good sig for Ballard and a bad sign for Mayor Peterson.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-88553894913151975392007-10-16T20:48:00.000-05:002007-10-16T20:48:00.000-05:00I think when Democrat blogs go after Ballard you can consider that a good sign for Ballard and a bad sign for Mayor Peterson.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-60453369383167533662007-10-16T20:44:00.001-05:002007-10-16T20:44:00.001-05:00"It was a puff piece, pure and simple. Kinda rare for her, but hey, it's Gannett now, a/k/a McNews." <BR/><BR/>So it's a puff piece because Schneider couldn't find anyone who would say anything bad about Ballard in their experience working with him? Is it possible he's a competent, well-accomplished person who is liked by people who know him?Gary R. Welshhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15185079937305083438noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-67194408309704830832007-10-16T20:42:00.000-05:002007-10-16T20:42:00.000-05:00I think that this sign is in poor taste........but then what would you expect from Ballard.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-59352226632738840042007-10-16T20:36:00.000-05:002007-10-16T20:36:00.000-05:00The blog-o-philes are only as threatening as you allow them to be. To me, they're just people with opinions. And some times their opinions are so malicious and one-sided, they make me politically head in the opposite direction. Wilson has opened my eyes as to how biased an individual can be toward their party: to the point of blindness.<BR/><BR/>I believe now more than ever I am truly non-party affiliated. Now depending on your views, people will disagree with that. If you share a couple of views as them, you're in their party and they'll stick a yard sign in you to prove it. If you disagree with a view, you're a "nutjob", "wingnut", blah, blah, blah...<BR/><BR/>Politicians and their followers in this town seem to behave like Junior High kids. It makes it hard not to stoop to their level. I asked Jen an honest question over on her blog and the ONLY thing she got out of it was that I called a lady "Mel-jack". My point was proven in that instant. And maybe I shouldn't care so much. Doesn't make her nasty, just proves my point about the local political scene.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-52954144073320812382007-10-16T20:31:00.000-05:002007-10-16T20:31:00.000-05:00Brian Howey as a barometer of what's correct in Indiana politics? Puh-leeeze.<BR/><BR/>And, for the record, as a former journalist, Ms. Schneider's article should've been labled news analysis...it was not news. It was a puff piece, pure and simple. Kinda rare for her, but hey, it's Gannett now, a/k/a McNews.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-570217121488601692007-10-16T19:58:00.000-05:002007-10-16T19:58:00.000-05:00I am an ex-Irvington resident who moved out after being robbed. The police did nothing. The police indicated that they knew who was doing the burglaries, but they would be right back on the streets due to jail overcrowding. Now hookers and drug dealers freely walk the streets in my old neighborhood, and are only outnumbered by for sale signs. It pains me to see it.<BR/><BR/>If anything gets done in Irvington, it's only because Peterson's little lapdog O'Connor lives there. I won't read Jen's Blog to see what Dawn had to say, but it suffices to say that she has to support him because of the promient D's that live in Irvington and because she doesn't want to give up the tablescraps that the city calls economic redevelopment. She means well, but she doesn't speak for the community.<BR/><BR/>Irvington needs help, not the window dressing that this Mayor will give it. And to think Irvington is one of the better-off neighborhoods in town.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-62585616636382808082007-10-16T19:54:00.000-05:002007-10-16T19:54:00.000-05:00Brian Howey was right. Jen Wagner is the nastiest woman in Indiana politics.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com