tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post4844292942736156734..comments2020-04-11T03:30:02.282-05:00Gary R. Welshhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15185079937305083438noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-40532100402664373922009-09-16T13:23:11.818-05:002009-09-16T13:23:11.818-05:00The numbers have shifted on account of who is being counted. Obama&#39;s lower number is a more conservative (and accurate) total of citizens without insurance; and as he said, non-citizens aren&#39;t eligible.<br /><br />I believe the higher totals reference the entire US population. Makes no sense that they would acknowledge those totals other than for inflammatory purposes, but their propaganda has little relation to reform quality.<br /><br />Regardless... 30 million? 45 million? 5 million? I don&#39;t like the course that the current reform is taking, but millions of uninsured and a non-sustainable health care system are both serious problems that need to be addressed.<br /><br />By the way, one plan is government run, assuming it passes -- which is looking iffy. Health care is not government run, nor would it be under the proposals currently in place.bobisimohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17043948097405363106noreply@blogger.com