Comments on Advance Indiana™: Taxpayers Billed $160,000 In Fight To Block Public Disclosure Of Lawmakers' Communications

Brian Bosma- you, sir, are a horse's hind end....

2016-04-05T15:21:21.832-05:00

Brian Bosma- you, sir, are a horse's hind end.

Why should any communications between Legislators ...

2016-04-05T12:08:47.017-05:00

Why should any communications between Legislators regarding the public's business be confidential? What do they have to hide from the people they are elected to serve?

Slaughter's involvement in this case in and of itself should disqualify him from serving on the Supreme Court. How can he justify not only taking public funds to prevent the public from knowing what its Legislators are up to, when the State has an Attorney General whose services are already paid for, but at such a high rate compared to the earnings of the average Hoosier? Oh, I forgot, the practice of law is now a business, no longer a profession.

There is no taxpayer money politicians won't s...

2016-04-05T10:12:41.928-05:00

There is no taxpayer money politicians won't spend to keep info from the public. Bismarck is the king of secrecy.

...if that's the case, Mr. Speaker, then why d...

2016-04-05T09:01:22.775-05:00

...if that's the case, Mr. Speaker, then why do you make certain constituent communications public - like your "Broom Guy" letter to the Postmaster? So much for confidentiality.

Indiana takes the "IN" out integrity.

2016-04-05T08:59:22.376-05:00

Indiana takes the "IN" out integrity.

Brought to you by the Republican Party, known as t...

2016-04-05T08:08:57.235-05:00

Brought to you by the Republican Party, known as the party of fiscal responsibility.

So the GA's attorneys worked 40 hours per week...

2016-04-05T07:50:17.711-05:00

So the GA's attorneys worked 40 hours per week for 10 whole weeks on this one case. Count me as being a tad bit skeptical.