tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post5515073103483588982..comments2020-04-11T03:30:02.282-05:00Comments on Advance Indiana™: Supreme Court Allows Lawmakers To Shield E-Mails From Public Disclosure On Non-Justiciable GroundsGary R. Welshhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15185079937305083438noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-29854308545531691942016-04-20T09:13:16.226-05:002016-04-20T09:13:16.226-05:00Got the name wrong - was Noe Escamilla and tenets ...Got the name wrong - was Noe Escamilla and tenets was my bad also but his case was a 2-1 by the Court of Appeals. Opinion was rendered that Escamilla's expert witness did not introduce testimony supporting the opposition's side of the case which was not even an issue to the plaintiff's argument. Big man wins little man loses. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-28467057718101382542016-04-19T16:52:04.560-05:002016-04-19T16:52:04.560-05:00The decision wasn't 2-1; it was 4-1.The decision wasn't 2-1; it was 4-1.Gary R. Welshhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15185079937305083438noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-77848392294859776712016-04-19T16:42:15.651-05:002016-04-19T16:42:15.651-05:00No surprise that Indiana judges can contort any ca...No surprise that Indiana judges can contort any case into the outcome they desire. Two to one decisions are just an example of the quandary that the system represents. Still mystified by the 2-1 Noe Echevarria appeals court decision that ignored basic rules of evidence tenants that first year law students could easily grasp. Perhaps higher court judges need a mandatory refresher course or are they all about protecting favored interests? Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com