I agree, Paul. The most important issue, though, i...

2011-05-05T17:13:46.811-05:00

I agree, Paul. The most important issue, though, is that Rokita had no legal duty to investigate the allegations. And like you point out, he did no more investigating and applying the law than what had already been discussed on the blogs.

Everyone just assumes as true that White could not...

2011-05-05T16:46:36.681-05:00

Everyone just assumes as true that White could not have been residing at his ex-wife and her new husband's house and therefore was committing voter fraud. But I believe CW, the ex-wife and her husband were all prepared to tell the grand jury exactly that and they were never called as witnesses by the prosecution.

Having now read the report, I haven't the foggest why that was ever classified as investigatory material and not subject to the open records law. What kind of ruling was that from the PAC?. All Rokita did was look at public documents and apply the law. There was no investigation.

Comments on Advance Indiana™: Rokita Investigatory Report On Charlie White Vote Fraud Investigations To Be Released After Clearance By Inspector General

I agree, Paul. The most important issue, though, i...

Everyone just assumes as true that White could not...