tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post575112730515751146..comments2020-04-11T03:30:02.282-05:00Gary R. Welshhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15185079937305083438noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-86998321370323271302015-06-27T11:25:01.850-05:002015-06-27T11:25:01.850-05:00One religion doesn&#39;t consider or tolerate same sex marriage as sharia-compliant. Under such fooling, er ruling, which population will grow in number so as to dominate &amp; ultimately destroy the other? It could never happen here right, because we&#39;re &quot;us&quot; &amp; therefore too &quot;smart&quot; for that- right? Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-12144617838603637942015-06-27T08:56:26.960-05:002015-06-27T08:56:26.960-05:00Anything that undermines government rule is good in my book, even if it takes some government on government battles.Eric Morrisnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-67812187195278782642015-06-27T07:33:24.803-05:002015-06-27T07:33:24.803-05:00The CJ <b>IS</b> correct in his analysis: if the states cannot define marriage as between one man plus one woman, then there is no reason to believe that the states can restrict it to two people. LamLawIndyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06039906566586150323noreply@blogger.com