tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post632998224331196270..comments2020-04-11T03:30:02.282-05:00Gary R. Welshhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15185079937305083438noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-16519681196313293672013-12-28T11:47:37.674-05:002013-12-28T11:47:37.674-05:00I don&#39;t know, Paul. The judicial qualifications commission had irrefutable evidence presented to it of another judge backdating an order in order to avoid the consequences of the lazy judge rule and did nothing to that judge, at least that was made public. The commission knew that the judge in question had more lazy judge motions filed against him than virtually any other judge in the state. Gary R. Welshhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15185079937305083438noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-39306840475908748082013-12-28T10:08:53.392-05:002013-12-28T10:08:53.392-05:00The Judicial Qualifications Commission and the Disciplinary Commission are not on the same page. They haven&#39;t been for years. The JQC I think does a good job of equally enforcing the rules. The DC, on the other hand, is extremely political and enforces the rules unevenly going after attorneys they don&#39;t like while overlooking much more severe violations by attorneys from the big, politically connected Indianapolis law firms. The DC can also be extremely vindictive if you don&#39;t roll over for them and dare fight back I have yet to hear any attorney praise how the DC does its job. No one likes how the DC has been run under Lundberg or Witte.Paul K. Ogdenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16137003328850866711noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-82444570167248957492013-12-28T09:54:28.210-05:002013-12-28T09:54:28.210-05:00Compare In Re Koethe with In Re Pfaff. Koethe made a deal. Pfaff apologized. Inconsistent results?<br />Koethe is now a Judge again. Pfaff is back to being a private attorney. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com