tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post6426081363233841500..comments2020-04-11T03:30:02.282-05:00Gary R. Welshhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15185079937305083438noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-19661816089638158912008-05-07T18:49:00.000-05:002008-05-07T18:49:00.000-05:00Penguins??? Please........only in Indianaartfugginshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05364503656694166926noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-14205107373568067482008-05-07T14:28:00.000-05:002008-05-07T14:28:00.000-05:00"The Supreme Court in its ruling stated that the plaintiffs had not submitted sufficient evidence of anyone being denied the right to vote....how about 12 nuns including one who is 98 years old with an expired passport..."<BR/><BR/>The crux of the ruling was actually that the plaintiffs did not effectively argue that it was an undue burden on the populace to obtain ID under the system the state had set. Wilson, I mean Art, didn't quote the part of the article where another nun specifically told these 12 that they'd need ID, days before the election. <BR/><BR/>Oh, and it was ALWAYS legal to request an absentee ballot and vote without ID.Markhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10525542680315157562noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-12936600955147705122008-05-07T14:14:00.000-05:002008-05-07T14:14:00.000-05:00"I suspect we have not heard the last of this voter suppression law".<BR/><BR/>Actually, Wilson's sock-puppet, you Have heard the last. The SCOTUS heard the case and ruled it passed constitutional muster. WHo gives a damn if some penguins decided they were above the law..I dont. For those of you who tout the mantra of religion being nowhere near government, its apporopriate that they were turned away, right?<BR/><BR/>No faux outrage, please. Thanks in advance.SW Lanehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04947293473791599939noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-76360617093721983452008-05-07T11:15:00.000-05:002008-05-07T11:15:00.000-05:00Repubicans claim that no responsible person is denied the right to vote without picture ID. The Supreme Court in its ruling stated that the plaintiffs had not submitted sufficient evidence of anyone being denied the right to vote....how about 12 nuns including one who is 98 years old with an expired passport...I suspect we have not heard the last of this voter suppression law.artfugginshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05364503656694166926noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-83205229850679864892008-05-07T08:16:00.000-05:002008-05-07T08:16:00.000-05:00Show us some proof of wrongdoing. Remember, the Republican-written voter ID rule makes it legal to request and vote an absentee ballot without showing any ID.Jon Easterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02463536746233150209noreply@blogger.com