tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post7485754049386236689..comments2020-04-11T03:30:02.282-05:00Gary R. Welshhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15185079937305083438noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-18219260264070768692008-09-25T15:42:00.000-05:002008-09-25T15:42:00.000-05:00We don't know what the kid Evans said. We only know what Curley said he said. We do know, however, that few if any Democrats are in a position to deliver or "procure" large numbers of Republican votes. Republican leaders on the other hand are making every effort to block Democrats from voting. If we're going to start polygraphing anyone, I'd start with Curley.Davidhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14277846528328929019noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-41167961692891192852008-09-25T14:09:00.000-05:002008-09-25T14:09:00.000-05:00First, AI, thanks for the follow up story and for getting the name and identity of this kid...because now I know how much of this is NOT Obama central. <BR/><BR/>You are right at your surprise that the Obama campaign would send somebody who is 23 to negotiate a huge deal like this, and this is how I know this offer never came from the actual campaign. <BR/><BR/>Put this kid on a polygraph and you'll learn he was playing hotshot because he wanted to brag how he went toe-to-toe with the R chair of one of Indiana's biggest counties and got him to give in by lying and saying Obama's people would push Daniels at the polls. People who are trying to seem more educated than they are use words like "procure." Now this idiot has people thinking the Obama campaign is going on e-bay and buying votes. <BR/><BR/>In short, my party needs to stop letting its young political operatives watch West Wing in syndication because too many think everything in politics is a secret back-room deal with political intrigue.POPAhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00558836541249077077noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-11231692049864697492008-09-25T14:04:00.000-05:002008-09-25T14:04:00.000-05:00I think everyone is missing the big point of this article:<BR/><BR/>The GOP chair wants to block making voting more accessible to people because it will hurt Daniels' reelection campaign.<BR/><BR/>Curley and Orrin differ on their stories of what was offered to who, so we can't debate that part, but Curley says right out that he can't support Democrats voting rights.<BR/><BR/>Anyone see a problem with this?Russellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05888390196512180753noreply@blogger.com