tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post8097397317055876762..comments2020-04-11T03:30:02.282-05:00Gary R. Welshhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15185079937305083438noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-66729918167353386772015-03-15T21:42:39.803-05:002015-03-15T21:42:39.803-05:00Runaway / AWOL / deserter government is, anarchy.Pete Boggshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12948800585492289789noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-58926526228477445062015-03-15T16:13:52.120-05:002015-03-15T16:13:52.120-05:00Good and/or limited government is an impossible myth. This is why I am an informed non-voting Anarcho-capitalist.Eric Morrisnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-84700196628704588072015-03-15T13:37:08.746-05:002015-03-15T13:37:08.746-05:00Can't the people file a lawsuit to obtain this information? What would that cost?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-51764563671527149242015-03-14T20:10:04.891-05:002015-03-14T20:10:04.891-05:00And that was exactly the legislature's intent, Greg. What they did not what to see happen was for bulk data used for SVRS to be made available as a public record and exploited for commercial purposes. As you and I know, however, that is happening anyway because of misuse by those for whom the data has been made available in bulk. Gary R. Welshhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15185079937305083438noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-5628461722373303122015-03-14T18:51:46.498-05:002015-03-14T18:51:46.498-05:00The PAC decision seems to conflict with Evansville Courier & Press v. Vanderburgh County Health Dep’t, 17 N.E.3d 922, 930 (Ind. 2014), available at http://www.in.gov/judiciary/opinions/pdf/10071401mm.pdf, which explained how the legislature probably had good reason for making something confidential from one agency while leaving it accessible if obtained from another agency.Greg Boweshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03586537039601621880noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-31409936663714578382015-03-14T17:11:11.516-05:002015-03-14T17:11:11.516-05:00Does this mean attorney Greg Purvis was given illegal access to confidential voting history information on Charlie White in 2010? No. Hamilton County simply follows long-standing state law making the voting history of voters public record. Gary R. Welshhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15185079937305083438noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-37824622080427378402015-03-14T17:04:17.210-05:002015-03-14T17:04:17.210-05:00No, you weren't breaking any laws. Each party has rules that apply to the use of the data uploaded into their proprietary databases. Each party has its own rules for the searching and use of data in their proprietary databases. Those who fail to comply with those rules can have their privileges to access the information suspended. Gary R. Welshhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15185079937305083438noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-7596675018140538312015-03-14T12:56:17.101-05:002015-03-14T12:56:17.101-05:00This is nuts. I have a friend who is a county chairman. I sat next to him one day when he accessed the party's database to look up people's voting history to see whether they voted and if they did which primary they voted in just for curiosity sake. Does that mean we were breaking the law if the information is supposed to be confidential?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com