Comments on Advance Indiana™: A Tale Of Two Georgia Streets

Anybody with two eyes (well, at least one) could c...

2012-07-11T22:53:45.604-05:00

Anybody with two eyes (well, at least one) could clearly see that it was a shoddy project - it was falling apart before the Super Bowl! - but that it par for the course for most infrastructure construction - they will be pouring money into this forever and IDI personnel will continue to draw big salaries but doing nothing and saying even less.

One news report (I think it was the wrapup on Barr...

2012-07-11T20:33:01.871-05:00

One news report (I think it was the wrapup on Barris' report) said the latest fixes are not a cost add-on, that it is covered under the original $12.5 mil.

So at least that's a good bit of news, assuming it is true.

Congratulations, republicans, for screwing the pub...

2012-07-11T10:13:30.191-05:00

Congratulations, republicans, for screwing the public again!

Excellent side by side comparison of the coverages...

2012-07-11T06:53:08.876-05:00

Excellent side by side comparison of the coverages.

I'm really surprised Jon actually used the word "stakeholders" in his article. That term is used almost exclusively by benefactors of corporate welfare and corporate shakedowns to suggest that others are benefitting from their actions and have a "stake" in what they're doing. Most media types rightly ignore the contrived, slanted term when doing stories.