tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post8678562131668488507..comments2020-04-11T03:30:02.282-05:00Gary R. Welshhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15185079937305083438noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-55030928909190149192009-09-19T12:30:08.023-05:002009-09-19T12:30:08.023-05:00This is a decision based on party politics. The democrats are flexing their muscles.indyerniehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03817373902728915873noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-18533262319578842272009-09-18T15:55:18.137-05:002009-09-18T15:55:18.137-05:00The Indiana Court of Appeals acted &quot;stupidly!&quot;Indy4U2Chttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16321040357893518968noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12703782.post-76893997565839097472009-09-18T11:12:41.904-05:002009-09-18T11:12:41.904-05:00I can understand their thought pattern - some people being treated differently than others.<br /><br />But, what strikes me is those people (absentee voters) they concluded are being treated differently because they don&#39;t have to show ID - well, they are STILL being treated differently because they aren&#39;t required to vote in person!<br /><br />Anyone who doesn&#39;t vote in person is &#39;different&#39; so we should eliminate the absentee ballot itself, if I follow their reasoning.Downtown Indyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06239811599722585898noreply@blogger.com