The ignorance of Hoosier governance knows no bounds when it comes to financing anything related to sports. Fishers' newly-elected mayor, Scott Fadness, wants the taxpayers of his city to grant a 10-year tax abatement and enter into a long-term lease with a private developer of a $76.4 million sports center valued at more than $800,000 annually to lease space at the facility for youth sporting-related activities. The multi-purpose facility will include a 6,000-seat arena, basketball, volleyball, ice hockey, basebal and yes, another soccer field. The Star's Chris Sikich
writes a glowing report, which reads more like a press release for the developers seeking the public money:
GK Sports and Entertainment proposes to build a $76.4 million recreational sports center with a massive fieldhouse and a 6,000-seat arena in Fishers, city officials have told The Indianapolis Star.
The Indianapolis-based company would own and operate the facility, but Fishers would have to agree to significant incentives to complete the deal.
The City Council will consider a 10-year tax abatement valued at $2 million $200,000 annually, the waiver of roughly $1 million in permitting fees and an $805,000 annual lease agreement for local youth sports access. The council will consider the proposal April 20 and vote May 18, after a series of public meetings.
Unless serious dissent appears, the project seems likely to move forward with a summer groundbreaking. Fishers officials will unveil the proposal at 10 a.m. Monday at a news conference at City Hall.
"I think all of us want to get this out to the community and see if people are excited about it," Mayor Scott Fadness said.
Youth and recreational sports can bring in big bucks from tourism. Hamilton County Tourism Inc. estimates the annual economic impact of the facility in Fishers at $110 million . . .
Company co-owner Barry Kiesel, who helped develop the Windermere community in Fishers, said the process has taken four years to get to this point. He thinks he can attract a minor league team to the arena and said the fieldhouse can accommodate 31 different sports.
"This is really a combination of what I call a community center during the week and an event center on the weekend," Kiesel said.
Fishers' $805,000 in lease money would rent space in the fieldhouse from 3 to 9 p.m. daily during the school year for HSE Youth Sports, a local recreational league with 11,500 members. A 200-meter walking/jogging track on a mezzanine in the fieldhouse also would be open to Fishers residents daily, potentially from 8 a.m. to 6 p.m.
HSE Sports Executive Director Linda Carlino said the organization uses gyms at Hamilton Southeastern Schools but often has to rent space at the Noblesville Boys & Girls Club or The Fieldhouse gym in Fishers. On any given night, the kids use 12 to 15 gyms, she said . . .
This should come as no surprise. Fishers' election of its first city officials following its conversion from a town council to a city was bought by the same corrupt forces that own city government in Carmel and Westfield where public financing of private development is standard operating procedure. Taxpayers in Fishers better get prepared because this is just the first of many times they are going to be bending over to pleasure these self-dealers in the coming years. Gannett, naturally, wants to do its job of keeping the Coliseum filled while Rome burns.
15 comments:
Wow. Fishers is already sitting on over $263M according to SBOA. Got to keep with the Jones's (Carmel)!
I know you can't control the Google ads that display in the margins but I found it amusing that a Jim Brainard ad popped up on AI.
Fishers residents asked for higher taxes and political cronyism with their move toward voting themselves to become a Town. Those of us who lived through the disgusting Democrat and Republican corruption in Indianapolis and Carmel (I have lived and owned in both) predicted prior to Fishers voting itself to be a Town it wouldn't be long before "Fishers" politicians and crony construction companies (think Keystone Construction and PEDCOR) began to financially rape its constituents. And without a doubt, more sports and government and P3 special interest deals will find a yellow brick road to Fishers residents' wallets.
Just as Castleton Mall is the new Lafayette Square, Indianapolis is the New Detroit no matter how many denials issue from Barnes and Thornburg, Ice Miller, and the crony Democrat-Republican machine who created the damage.
I will not have a twinge of sorrow for Fishers residents who will eventually find themselves with higher tax bills and as a haven from which they could escape the deteriorated Indianapolis. How can it be Fishers residents' financial rape when the taxpaying voters were willing?
"Hamilton County Tourism Inc. estimates the annual economic impact of the facility in Fishers at $110 million."
I guess it would be too much to ask the Stenographer at The Star or Readers on the TV Media to investigate and analyze where this $110 Million number is derived from. What is exactly is meant by Economic Impact?? What verifiable statistical analysis was performed???
They really need to include a cricket field, otherwise they cannot get sufficient patronage.
There's no place like "Home Place". May we never be annexed by these power mad fools. I have spoken to Rick Sharp about this issue and I can only hope and pray the voters of Carmel do the right thing and knock my fellow parishioner Brainard to the curb. Ha ha, suckers in Fishers, you get what you deserve!
"voting themselves to become a Town"
Nitpick - Fishers *was* a town. Now it's a city.
This news reminds me of dear friends who not too long ago placed their north Carmel home on the market and the property sold very quickly. Unable to find another Carmel home to fit their needs, my friends ended up purchasing in Fishers.
After attending the first few pubic meetings as Fishers emerged to become a "city" and as mayor and council candidates came forward, my friends reported they believed that had to move out of Fishers. They told me they'd never encountered people so stupid about government, municipal works, and maintaining neighborhood infrastructure.
My friends tell me they feel quite lucky to have sold their Fishers home and to have fled the fledgling city of fools. I'd say after reading this latest AI news report I now more fully understand my friends' motivation.
Fadness said the city will be taking on no debt and "the financial structure of the project will not put local residents property taxes on the line to pay for it."
Is this a scenario of if it sounds too good to be true it probably is? I find it all confusing but as a resident of Fishers am definitely concerned.
Fishers will take on no debt? BS! What do you call that sweetheart lease you're signing, which allegedly gives citizens the right to use the facility for a few hours a day four days a week?? It's nothing more than a runaround referendum laws.
Does anyone know the term of the lease? Let's assume 20 years and the annual rate is fixed (very unlikely it doesn't adjust for inflation). 20 x 805k = 16.1M. The tax abatement is 10 x 2M = 20M. 800k in waived fees. That comes to about $37M in subsidies. Total construction cost is $76M. So Fishers is paying about half, and getting no ownership interest. Great job Fishers, way to think it through.
Yes, I found it hard to believe Fadness when he said Fishers would take on no debt. As mentioned I find it all confusing, just trying to figure it out so I can ask some halfway intelligent questions at the community meetings we're having to address concerns. I voted for Fishers to remain a town BTW :) Thanks for the info. everyone.
"The $800,000 annual lease will be paid in part, over time, from property taxes generated by the complex. An admissions fee for ticketed events (such as out of town tournaments) will go the the city, and estimates put that revenue at $100,000 and $200,000 of revenue per year."
Found here: http://www.larryinfishers.com/proposed-sports-complex---what-it-means-.html
I made an error on the tax abatement that I've corrected. It's $2 million over the 10-year period. So $200,000 annually. Looks like you copy/pasted this before the change.
Thanks for the correction, Chris.
Post a Comment