Tuesday, September 11, 2012
Honor The Dead With The Truth
I've never doubted that terrorists were responsible for flying hijacked planes into the World Trade Center Towers. I've always had problems understanding the perfect implosion of the two towers and Building 7 following the attacks. The video above, narrated by actor Ed Asner, explains why experts say that Building 7, which was not struck by the planes, could have only been brought down by a planned demolition. The government has told us that fires that broke out in the building caused the building to collapse, which makes absolutely no sense even to a lay person. There are also many experts who doubt that the two towers could have collapsed as they did without assistance. On the anniversary of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, Americans should demand the truth from their government about what really brought those buildings down. What do you think?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
8 comments:
Gary, thank you so much for publishing this. Everyone, even those of you foolish enough to believe the official version of events, should watch this video with an open mind.
And while you do, reflect on all the times in history members of our government intentionally lied to us.
For me one of the most compelling reasons to doubt the official version of events is to know that most of the 9/11 commission members do not believe their own report.
It would be great if Indiana would show this video on television. Richard Wilcox is preparing a book review of WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO? by Dr. Judy Woods, whose law suit on behalf of the public, did reach the Supreme Court, and whose causal arguments are very scholarly and fascinating.
The official story is so far-fetched! Cui bono? "The 11th Anniversary of 9/11" by Paul Craig Roberts faults our government for REFUSING to conduct a REAL investigation. Thanks, Gary, for your attempts to 'honor the dead with the truth'.
I'm not sure which is scarier, Melyssa. The fact that we've lost a free media that will dare to question the government's narrative, or the complacency/ignorance of the masses who fail to see what is happening right before their eyes. I no longer recognize the country in which I was born. It's like I'm living in a foreign land.
So lemme get your theory straight:
George W. Bush concocted 9/11 with a controlled demolition of 1 and 2 World Trade Center AFTER they were hit by the planes, apparently with explosives that had been wired into the skyscrapers BEFORE the planes hit.
But, not believing that the destruction of two major national landmarks and symbols of American financial power would be enough to energize the American people for a war, he also arranged for the demolition of 7 World Trade Center, a nondescript building most Americans had never heard of that even most New Yorkers would be hard-pressed to identify.
"Yeah, knocking down the Twin Towers won't make Americans mad, but that 7 World Trade Center? They'll NEVER stand for that!"
You seriously believe this?
Laugh all you want, Jeff. You're the one who got axed by the state's top law enforcement officer for behaving like a whacko on the Internet. Building 7 served as headquarters for New York's emergency management services and housed several important government offices, including the CIA, the Department of Defense, the Secret Service, the SEC, and the IRS, not to mention the building's largest client, Salomon Brothers. The building sat above a substation for ConEdison. George W. Bush's younger brother, Marvin, was a principal in the company that provided security for the WTC complex at the time of the September 11th attacks and his cousin, Wirt Walker, was the CEO of that security company. The Bushes are always right there--Dallas in 1963 and the Watergate break-in in 1972. It was no coincidence that the family of Reagan's would-be assassin, John Hinckley, was best friends with the Bush family. Both father and son Bush worked for the CIA long before they entered government service. They're both masters of false flag operations. Prescott Bush played a key role in financing of Nazi Germany in the lead-up to WWII while he worked as an investment banker at Harriman Brothers with his father-in-law, George Herbert Walker. They count on dupes like you to provide their cover.
And, yet, I'm not the one who is advocating a theory of a massive false flag conspiracy by our own government without so much as a shred of evidence.
Well, you might start by opening your eyes and your mind.
Next you'll be saying that the Bush family was involved in the kidnapping of the Lindbergh baby, the explosion of the Maine, the assassination of Abraham Lincoln, the treason of Benedict Arnold and the disappearance of the Roanoke colony. Who knows? Maybe you'll toss in the death of Harold the Saxon, the ambush of Varus' legions at Teutoberg Forest, the assassination of Caesar, the treason of Alcibiades and the Trojan Horse. Obviously, the Bush family is far worse than the Borgias.
Just listen to yourself, Gary. Theories like this are why most of us think Ron Paul is a nutcase. No evidence. No logic. No science. No history. You can't accept that the US did absolutely nothing to deserve 9/11, because that would mean your worldview is wrong, so you Ronulans have to manufacture a theory too crazy even for Charlie Manson.
Post a Comment